Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Keith R. Holden, M.D.'s avatar

The authors of this study say, "We show that germline or somatic BRCA1 variants are not a major contributor to prostate cancer." However, this study has significant limitations and is inconsistent with other studies, making its conclusion questionable.

1. The study does not clearly differentiate between biallelic versus monoallelic loss of BRCA1.

2. The study was not a systematic screening of all men presenting with prostate cancer at diagnosis (e.g., aggressive localized or metastatic disease), so the case indices for de novo hormone-sensitive metastatic or localized prostate cancer cannot be calculated with confidence.

3. Because the population tested is relatively newly diagnosed with most diagnostic testing (>80%) in the last 2 years, implications on outcomes and metastatic disease cannot be confidently asserted for BRCA1.

4. The much smaller prevalence of BRCA1 (0.44%) versus BRCA2 (6%) in this study likely limits the statistical power to detect a significant association between BRCA1 mutations and prostate cancer progression

The low frequency of BRCA1 mutations in multiple studies, including this one, makes it challenging to draw firm conclusions about its independent effect on prostate cancer progression.

It is documented that biallelic inactivation of BRCA1 leads to a complete loss of function in homologous recombination repair, resulting in higher genomic instability, which suggests a more aggressive cancer phenotype. Some researchers think that biallelic loss of BRCA1 may be associated with more aggressive prostate cancer because it results in the complete loss of HHR. Definitive studies need to be done to confirm this assertion, as well as the conclusion made in this study.

Expand full comment

No posts